Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 701 to 720 of 824

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments Check all Uncheck all 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures Check all Uncheck all 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations Check all Uncheck all 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports Check all Uncheck all 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems Check all Uncheck all 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding Check all Uncheck all 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Check all Uncheck all Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Check all Uncheck all Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Check all Uncheck all Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Check all Uncheck all Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Check all Uncheck all Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Check all Uncheck all Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-126	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Eswatini: Ministry of Trade	Eswatini	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Single channel marketing for sugar and sugar products.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that the status quo remains because the Sugar Act has not been reviewed.
NTB-000-127	1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Eswatini: NAMBOARD	Eswatini	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Government owns several parastatals that carry out trade.NAMBOARD receives vegetables on consignment from farmers and sells in hotels etc. If the consignment spoils because it is not bought, the farmer loses. At the same time NAMBOARD issues out licences for importing of similar items to those it trades in. The products affected are maize, rice, wheat, fruits and vegetables, flour, poultry, animal feed.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that NAMBOARD issues import permits for vegetables and wheat as per the infant industry protection provision in the SACU 2002 Agreement.
NTB-000-128	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges	2009-07-26	Eswatini: Bordergate	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Lack of standardization in application of regulations, which currently differ per individual officer, per border post.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that Standards in application of procedures are in place. Where these are not clear officers may use discretion. This results in non uniformity.
NTB-000-327	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-09	Eswatini: Bordergate	Eswatini	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	There is a lack of proper customs procedures and harmonization at the border posts as well as lack of an automated customs declaration system linking Swaziland Borders.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that ASYCUDA ++ has been rolled out in 60 percent of the border posts. However it is fully operational on exports. Some modules especially those related to deferment on imports have not yet been implemented yet. Capacity constraints and lack of financial resources and telecommunications infrastructure continue to pose a challenge. Nonetheless, the amendment to the Customs and Excise Act seeking to introduce mandatory electronic declaration has gone through the first reading in Parliament. It is believed that the law will facilitate the allocation of resources to the automation programme. The Department has reviewed the Memorandum of Agreement signed with South Africa with an aim to initiate discussions that will lead to ICT interconnectivity.
NTB-000-330	7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure	2009-09-09	Eswatini: Bordergate	Eswatini	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Anti Smuggling, Quality Control & Examination Teams at border posts lack proper equipment such as forklifts, motor vehicles to carry out inspection.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that the procurement of equipment is affected by the lack of financial resources. However, measures are taken to have goods examined at owner’s premises where equipment is available.
NTB-000-497	5.1. Quantitative restrictions Policy/Regulatory	2012-05-08	Eswatini: Bordergate	South Africa	Resolved 2015-12-03	View
Complaint:	Swaziland is to impose Quantitive import restrictions on imported edible cooking oil from within the SADC region as well as 15% import duties over and above the quantitive restriction. Such has happen already on Wheat Flour and after 8 years of 'Infancy Protection', NO IMPORT permits are issued to date. Court Case is currently being heard by the High Court of Swaziland. (Various Stakeholders versus Government of Swaziland)
Resolution status note:	At their meeting held on 23 May 2013, the SCTF recalled Articles 3 and 7 of the Trade Protocol, on elimination of trade barriers and quantitative restrictions. Swaziland reported that measure was implemented in the context of the SACU, which provides for quantitative restrictions and protection of infant industry protection. SCTF requested Swaziland to provide its relevant national legal instrument and information on how the measure is applied including whether or not it is applicable to trade with non-SACU SADC FTA Member States. Swaziland undertook to provide the information as requested. Swaziland submitted the legislation as per requirement . This NTB is therefore resolved .
Products:	1205.10: Low erucic acid rape or colza seeds "yielding a fixed oil which has an erucic acid content of < 2% and yielding a solid component of glucosinolates of < 30 micromoles/g", 1205.90: High erucic rape or colza seeds "yielding a fixed oil which has an erucic acid content of >= 2% and yielding a solid component of glucosinolates of >= 30 micromoles/g", whether or not broken and 1206.00: Sunflower seeds, whether or not broken
NTB-000-516	2.9. Issues related to transit fees	2012-07-01	Eswatini: Ngwenya	Mozambique	Resolved 2013-06-10	View
Complaint:	My family and I were requested to pay an "alledged" import duty for groceries valued at around 800 Rands even though we clearly stated that we were in transit travelling from South Africa to Mozambique. The customs official kept insisting that we would be given a receipt and to our amazement the receipt had my husband's name but instead of his addressing being Maputo it was registered Manzini. Would the Swazi focal point(s) please clarify if this is the usual procedure for goods transiting Swazilang, whether commercial or for personal consumption
Resolution status note:	On 10 June 2013, Swaziland Focal Point reported that the matter had been settled with the complainant after all information supplied was verified with Swaziland Revenue authority requirements for th eimportation of personal goods.
NTB-000-058	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2009-02-09	Eritrea: Eritrea Revenue Authority	Kenya	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Kenya reported that the Government of Eritrea is rejecting the COMESA Certificate of origin on processed meat exports from the Farmers Choice in Kenya due to authenticity of Signatures.
Resolution status note:	Eriteria reported that the issue was resolved by the COMESA customs and trade committee meeting
Products:	2102.10: Active yeasts
NTB-000-031	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2008-12-23	Egypt: Ministry of Trade	Uganda	Resolved 2009-02-04	View
Complaint:	: Authorisation fees for endorsement of COMESA Certificate of Origin Uganda has complained that Egypt authorities require that Certificates of Origin be endorsed by the Egyptian Embassy in Kampala before dispatch of the goods
Resolution status note:	Issue was resolved through COMESA Customs and Trade Committee
NTB-000-030	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2008-12-22	Egypt: Ministry of Trade	Kenya	Resolved 2011-05-11	View
Complaint:	Kenya complained that Egyptian authorities were demanding the galvanized steel coils should be engraved with the wording 'Made in Kenya as proof of origin'
Resolution status note:	Egypt reported that the issue had been resolved through diplomatic channels. the Egyptian authorities forwarded an official reply in this regard through diplomatic channels including that the technical standard on Egyptian imports of galvanized steel coils, as well as the COMESA rules of origin does not require codification of the indication of origin on the product.
Products:	7208.39: Flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of a width of >= 600 mm, in coils, simply hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, of a thickness of < 3 mm, not pickled, without patterns in relief
NTB-000-006	2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers	2004-05-29	Egypt: Egypt Revenue Authority	Uganda	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Authorisation fees for endorsement of COMESA Certificate of Origin Uganda has complained that Egypt authorities require that Certificates of Origin be endorsed by the Egyptian Embassy in Kampala before dispatch of the goods.
Resolution status note:	Egypt reported that she does not require consular or Embassy export documentation. A ministerial Decree issued by the Government of Egypt was circulated to all COMESA Member States on March 22 2007.
NTB-000-678	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory	2011-08-25	Egypt: Egyptian Customs Authority - Ministry of Finance	Kenya	Resolved 2016-02-08	View
Complaint:	Non acceptance of COMESA certificates of origin on mill white sugar, LG Electronics (TV sets) originating from Kenya
Resolution status note:	On 8th February 2016 , Focal Point for Egypt reported that the NTB be considered resolved on the basis of a recommendation from a joint visit on the spot verification for Mill White Sugar and LG products (TV Sets) was undertaken that White sugar & LG Electronics (TV sets) qualify for preferential treatment according to COMESA protocol of ROO.
NTB-000-933	7.7. Complex variety of documentation required	2018-10-12	Egypt: Port Said Sea Port	Mauritius	Resolved 2020-10-08	View
Complaint:	The Egyptian authorities require a number of lengthy and costly documentation for clearance of consignment at customs. The identified cumbersome documentation requirements are as follows: 1. All export documents must be signed and stamped by the exporter's legal representative 2. All export documents must be signed and stamped by the Prime Minister's Office of Mauritius (Apostille requirement) 3. All export documents must be signed and stamped by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mauritius (Apostille requirement) 4. All export documents must be signed and stamped by the Egyptian Embassy in Mauritius 5. All export documents must be signed and stamped by the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry Some products also require a Certificate of Origin issued by the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry despite being already accompanied by a COMESA Certificate of Origin.
Resolution status note:	During the 5th Meeting of the COMESA Trade and Trade Facilitation Sub Committee held on 6- 8 October , Mauritius reported that the NTB had been resolved
NTB-001-058	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2022-03-12	Egypt: Egypt Revenue Authority	Egypt	Resolved 2023-04-06	View
Complaint:	The Egyptian customs rejected to apply the COMESA certificate of origin issued by Madagascar attached because the signature is different. COMESA Secretariat is therefore requested to check the attached received from the shipper and advise on way forward.
Resolution status note:	During the COMESA Workshop on Capacity building for Member States held on 2- 6 April 2023, which reviewed this NTB, Egypt National Focal Point was requested to update status of the rejected consignment which was accompanied by the COMESA Certificate of Origin in the online system. However, on further review, it the meeting recommended that this complaint be regarded as resolved because the COMESA Certificate of Origin in question was not confirmed to be authentic.
NTB-000-256	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Namibia	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	DRC customs, cause problems on road transport through delaying trucks to depart on time to Lubumbashi
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that the NTB does not exist at present.
NTB-000-379	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2010-02-19	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Namibia	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	DRC is charging exorbitant fees which are not in line with SADC and COMESA harmonized fees.From 01/02/10 DRC did not reduce their tolls they instead greatly increases them. Road tolls in DRC are about 15 ( 1500 % ) times greater than the SADC recommended. Today a foreign transporter entering DRC at Kasumbalesa going to Tenke Fungurume mine ( 300 kms each way ) is subject to the following tolls and fees (distance of 300 kms into DRC and 300 kms out of DRC): Road toll Kasumbalesa/Lubumbashi return $ 300 ; Road tolls Lubumbashi/Likasi return $ 300; Road tolls Likasi/Tenke return $ 150 ; Government tax $ 50 ; Fumigation Fees $ 50 ; Card entry $ 15 ; Tourism/Vaccination fees $ 35 ; Visa for truck $ 25 ; Break bulk fees $ 20. Total cost to the transporter in Fees and Tolls is $ 945. That works out at $ 157.5 per 100 kms. The SADC agreed is $ 10 per 100 kms.
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that the NTB does not exist at present.
NTB-000-304	2.14. Other	2009-09-09	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Resolved 2010-12-02	View
Complaint:	Lack of knowledge of regulations by customs officials
Resolution status note:	DRC is participating in the SADC Customs Management project where by the customs officials are now actively involved in regional matters.
NTB-000-307	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges	2009-09-09	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Resolved 2010-12-02	View
Complaint:	Limited knowledge of customs procedures and documentation therefore officials impose arbitrary requirements at border posts
Resolution status note:	DRC is actively participating inthe SADC Customs Cooperation Committee thereby increasing knowledge of customs procedures and requirements
NTB-000-309	5.3. Export taxes Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-09	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Ministry of Trade	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Resolved 2010-07-30	View
Complaint:	Export duty is levied on timber.
NTB-000-311	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-09	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Ministry of trade	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Resolved 2010-07-30	View
Complaint:	High road charges and transport costs for exporters

<< Previous 1 2 3...34 35 36 37 38...40 41 42 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints